Resources / Executives
Executives / Investigations

Being Investigated at Work: What Senior Leaders Should Do, and Not Do

An investigation is a process with a record. The way you conduct yourself during it often matters as much as the allegation itself.

The short answer

Stay calm, cooperate truthfully, and remember that the company's lawyer or investigator works for the company, not for you. Do not contact the complainant or witnesses about the matter, do not delete or take company data, keep private notes of what happens, and speak with your own employment attorney early if your job, equity, or reputation is at risk.

Understand whose process this is

When a company investigates a complaint against a senior leader, the investigator is usually HR, in-house counsel, or an outside lawyer hired by the company. Their job is to find facts for the company. If a lawyer interviews you, you may hear a version of what is called an Upjohn warning: the lawyer represents the company, the conversation is privileged, and the company, not you, decides whether to waive that privilege. The name comes from the Supreme Court's decision in Upjohn Co. v. United States (1981).

That warning is not an accusation. It is a reminder that no one in the room is there to protect your interests. Hear it that way.

Before the interview

  • Ask what the process is: who is investigating, the general subject, and whether you may bring notes. You may not be told the details, and that is normal.
  • Review your own calendar and records for the relevant period so your answers are accurate. Do not create, edit, or backdate documents.
  • Preserve, do not purge. Deleting messages or files after you learn of an investigation can do more damage than the allegation.
  • Get advice. If termination, a claim against you personally, or a regulatory issue is possible, talk to your own employment attorney before the interview, not after.

In the interview

  • Answer truthfully and directly. If you do not know or do not remember, say so. Do not guess or speculate about others' motives.
  • Stay composed. Investigators note demeanor as well as content, and an executive who argues, dismisses, or attacks the complainant creates a record that is hard to undo.
  • Offer the names of people and documents that support your account. Investigations are only as complete as the evidence they are given.
  • Ask to review or correct any written summary of your statement before you sign it.

What not to do

  • Do not contact the complainant or witnesses about the investigation, even to "clear the air." It will likely be seen as interference or retaliation.
  • Do not change anyone's assignments, reviews, or compensation while the matter is open without counsel's input. Retaliation findings often outlast the original allegation.
  • Do not forward company documents to personal email or devices. Keep your own notes of dates, conversations, and requests on a personal device, without confidential company data.
  • Do not discuss the matter on internal channels or social media.

Administrative leave, indemnification, and the next move

Companies often place senior leaders on paid administrative leave during an investigation. Leave is not a finding. Confirm in writing that pay and benefits continue, what access you will keep, and how you will be contacted. If you are an officer or director, ask whether the company's bylaws, your indemnification agreement, or D&O insurance may cover personal legal costs.

Most investigations end in one of three places: the allegation is not substantiated, it is partly substantiated with corrective action, or it leads to separation. If separation is possible, the time to think about positioning, the announcement, and the terms is while the investigation is still open. See how executives negotiate severance.

If you are covered by a union contract, you may have the right to request a representative in an investigatory interview. See Weingarten rights.

"Executives rarely lose their jobs over the first allegation. They lose them over what they do in the weeks after it."

Noël Tarquinii, SHRM-SCP
Key data points
47.8%

Of FY2024 EEOC charges alleged retaliation, the most common basis for 17 straight years.

EEOC FY2024 enforcement statistics
1981

Year the Supreme Court decided Upjohn, the basis for the warning that company counsel represents the company.

Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383
$11.5M

Federal jury award against SHRM (D. Colo., December 2025) in a case where the handling of the internal investigation was central.

HR Brew

Common questions

Do I have to participate in a workplace investigation?

In most private-sector jobs, refusing to cooperate can itself be grounds for discipline. You can ask questions about the process and get your own legal advice, but refusing outright is rarely a good strategy.

Can I bring my own lawyer to the interview?

Usually not as a right in a private-sector internal investigation, though some companies allow it for senior leaders. Your lawyer can still prepare you beforehand and advise you afterward.

Will I find out who complained?

Often you will learn the substance of the allegation but not every detail or source. The company is expected to protect the complainant and witnesses from retaliation.

Should I resign before the investigation finishes?

Usually not without advice. Resigning mid-investigation can forfeit severance and leverage, and it does not always end the investigation or what is said about it.

What is an Upjohn warning?

A statement from a company lawyer that they represent the company, not you, that the conversation is privileged, and that the company controls the privilege. It comes from Upjohn Co. v. United States (1981).

When to bring in counsel

Speak with your own employment attorney early if termination, personal liability, a regulatory inquiry, or criminal exposure is possible, and before any interview where company counsel is present. Workplace Intelligence advises on conduct, positioning, and next moves; it does not provide legal advice.

For executives and senior leaders

Your next move matters. Do not guess.

Private advisory with Noël Tarquinii for executives facing a separation, a performance plan, an investigation, or a board conflict. Confidential, strategic, and built on 30+ years in executive leadership, the C-suite, and Executive HR.